Tag Archive for 'George Bush'

Where’s The Outrage?

Lehman Brothers Last night I was up much later than I should be watching the news about the financial crisis that has been unfolding. And to be honest it made it hard for me to go to sleep.

I do not work for a financial services company, nor do I have a significant investment portfolio as far as financial holdings go. But I could not stop running scenarios through my mind how my quality of life (and that of my daughter when she is older) is going to be worse off than previous generations.

To be blunt, we are in for a WORLD of hurt - possibly rivaling that of the Great Depression.

I found myself wondering, “Where’s the outrage?” I tuned into CNN today and they were covering OJ’s new trial live. Here we are in the midst of a very important presidential election, the economy is in shambles, we have no energy policy, we are in an open-ended war. And despite all that CNN figured it was in our best interests to follow OJ’s latest courtroom saga.

So where’s the outrage? Where are people DEMANDING change?

It’s to the point where it is just another short-lived news headline anytime a major institution fails. You know, like Enron or Arthur Andersen.

But this is not just another news item. It’s not every day a 150-year old institution fails. That is something that definitely does not happen every day.

So how bad is it? It is bad enough that the venerable Lehman Brothers filed for chapter 11.

Lehman Brothers is one of the oldest, perhaps one of the most respected securities firms out there. It was founded in 1850 and not only survived the Civil War, but they were instrumental in financing the reconstruction in the south, particularly Alabama.

Lehman also weathered the Great Depression, primarily by focusing on venture capital.

So let me repeat that - Lehman Brothers survived both the Civil War AND the Great Depression, but could not survive the Bush years.

Bear Stearns, Countrywide, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Merrill Lynch etc. The list goes on and on. Some of the largest financial institutions in the nation dead or close to. Or being bought for pennies on the dollar.

And all of this is a result of republican policy - or lack there of.

In republican circles, laissez-faire is the only way they know. Their ardent adherence to the ideology of Milton Friedman, that government regulation of any kind is evil, or better yet, corrupt.

From Wikiquote:

Corruption is government intrusion into market efficiencies in the form of regulations.

Now how does this tie into the current events?

Well, it just so happens that John McCain’s economic adviser, Phil Gramm, was the author of a bill in 2000 that deregulated what is known as credit default swap.

A credit default swap is a very complicated financial instrument that basically allows financial institutions to “insure” their debt using other institutions.

The undervaluation of credit risk and the lack of regulation caused speculation (and greed) to run rampant, and ultimately as institutions failed, it had a cascading effect through the financial system.

And this thing is far from done. We have AIG and Washington Mutual in precarious positions as well.

So this brings me back to the point again - WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE? These businesses are not simply folding. They are imploding, bringing the larger economy down with them. Republicans who always come out against “handouts” are first in line for the bailouts. Jobs are being lost. And yet there is no outrage.

There is that old saying, “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?”

But what if we have a FOREST falling down and MILLIONS of people around to hear it, but no one is making any sounds?

Something is very wrong.

–Jon

Capitulation: It’s What’s For Dinner! (Updated)

Democratic PartyIt is now near the end of 2007 the first year the democratic party has controlled both houses of congress since 1993 and a good time to evaluate the past year.

I am not sure how to say this in a more kind and less offensive way so I am just going to come out and say it - we are pretty fucked right about now. It seems the more important the issue is to the electorate, the more likely the democratically-controlled congress is going to capitulate to the Bush administration and with it their constituency of neocons, crooks, and zealots.

The sad thing is that we are not in this predicament because of the failures of the republican party (which there is so many one could write volumes) but the failure of the democratic leadership in passing any substantial legislation for the people of the United States at all.

The democratic party was elected to the majority of both chambers of congress in 2006 because of one main factor: Iraq. Iraq has become the 800-pound gorilla in the room and is arguably one of the biggest blemishes on this nation’s history and standing, and the public saw the democratic party as the only way to end this debacle and reign in Bush.

According to this poll (warning: PDF) back in January, 45% of the people polled wanted the new congress to focus on Iraq compared to the second most common answer, the economy, at only 7%.

And then you have this other poll (warning: PDF) from back in March that found that 59% of ALL Americans wanted legislation calling for a troop pullout from Iraq by August 2008. 59%! That is not some small group of extremists or some fringe group, but the majority of the American public.

So what is the newly-elected democratic leadership to do? A wise person would choose to give the public what they expected and get us the fuck out of Iraq. Well, to their credit they did give it one good shot only to have Mr. 24% approval rating veto it.

But since this high-point in their tenure, it has been all downhill with the majority party acting more like a timid schoolboy afraid to get some bumps or scrapes on the playground than the party that was elected to change the direction of the country.

Should the democrats be surprised when under their leadership that congress has a record-low 11% approval rating when they constantly let people down?

Just last month Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Democrats won’t approve more money for the Iraq war this year unless President Bush agrees to begin bringing troops home. And what does our democratically-controlled congress say today? Here’s another $70 billion George! Yes, that’s right. They capitulated yet AGAIN to not only give the worst president in US history more funding for the most expensive and worst foreign policy disaster in United States history, but they also are going to do so without any conditions.

Capitulation goes beyond Iraq too. Today there was MASSIVE capitulation on an update to the FISA bill, this time giving telecom companies that illegally cooperated with the Bush administration’s domestic spy program (with some assistance coming BEFORE 9/11) retroactive immunity. This is basically a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card for all these multi-billion dollar telecoms who willingly and knowingly were breaking the law.

Where is the oversight? Where is the accountability? Where is the action? Where is the outrage?

If this blatant disregard for the electorate’s wishes had happened 100 years ago there would be a revolution. But in today’s society of iPods, reality TV, MySpace, it seems that apathy is running at an all-time high.

So I guess the question is what do we do now? I have no fucking clue, but moving seems like such a good option at times.

–Jon

UPDATE: Looks like Senator Dodd’s threat of a filibuster against fellow democrats on the FISA bill worked and forced Harry Reid to table the bill until January. Kudos to Senator Dodd for standing up for what’s right.

Also here is a snippet of a zinger from Senator Ted Kennedy which basically sums up why this bill with retroactive immunity for the telecoms is BS:

The President has said that American lives will be sacrificed if Congress does not change FISA. But he has also said that he will veto any FISA bill that does not grant retro-active immunity. No immunity, no FISA bill. So if we take the President at his word, he’s willing to let Americans die to protect the phone companies.