Monthly Archive for December, 2007

Review: Command & Conquer 3

Command & Conquer 3I have been an avid fan of real-time strategy games ever since the first time I played Dune II on my old Pentium 90 back in 1993 up through the now-legendary StarCraft. Building up a base, gathering resources, building and mobilizing armies and the rapid pace at which you have to make decisions in a tough, competitive match can be a real adrenaline rush.

I remember back in 1998 when StarCraft first came out that we would play it on the LAN in our office every evening when work was done for the day. Some of the games went late into the night and would be pretty heated. The best times were our 4 vs 4 games. These were the real battles. The rivalries and competitive drive would rival that of cross-town baseball teams. There would be shit-talking, name-calling, teasing, gloating etc. And we loved every bit of it.

Well, that is almost ten years ago, and while some may disagree with me, I have to say the genre has become stagnant over the last 6-7 years with most of the new titles being released either being a) shitty or b) minor upgrade/re-skin of an older title. Then you had good franchises that had a good title, but the factions were poorly balanced like in Red Alert 2: Yuri’s Revenge. No one can tell me with a straight face that Yuri’s faction was balanced.

Enter Command & Conquer 3. C&C3 was released this past spring, but due to my ill-conceived assumptions that it would suck I did not get around to buying it until recently. In fact, if not for a trip to the Apple store and seeing it on the shelf I might not have tried it. But being that I am a happy Mac user who is experimenting with Mac gaming (improving but still has a long way to go) I decided to buy it for the hell of it.

Needless to say I was pleased. The game is fun. The artificial intelligence seems to be a HUGE improvement over previous titles in the franchise. And as far as graphics go this one is probably the biggest leap forward in an RTS game to date. In fact even on my Macbook Pro with it’s substantial specs, setting all the graphics options to full slowed the game down enough to be noticeable.

First thing I did was fire up some skirmish games to get a feel for it. Set up some games with me and three computer teammates versus four computer opponents. A cocky decision - I set the AI for my opponents to “brutal” - in Red Alert 2 I could man-handle brutal computer opponents even out-numbered. In Command & Conquer 3 I got curb-stomped pretty hard.

I had a base in the corner of the map with a substantial defensive setup and the AI was smart enough the find the one hole I had and exploit the hell out of it. I quickly learned that the artificial intelligence is not the same inept AI as in the past. No longer would they repeatedly zerg my most fortified points. At one point they even somehow managed to sneak this massive artillery unit into the thin strip of land behind my base on the border of the map to bombard the hell out of my power plants which brought my defensive systems down and enabled them to hit me from the front of my base as well. I pretty much got my ass handed to me.

Another cool option when setting up a skirmish game is that not only can you set the level of the AI for the computer opponents, but now you can set their style - ie. they can focus on all-out offensive rush, turtle-like defense, or balanced. Combine these factors with the difficulty, and the new handicap modifier the game has a substantial amount of room to customize the battle. Whether you want a near-impossible scenario, or a game where you fire it up and just romp all over the computer you can pretty much do it all.

As with other real-time strategy games, there are many web sites where you can download custom player-created maps to try out. Some are designed to give you unlimited resources so you can really give it to your opponent while others are designed to make it hard to attack the opposing bases by using landscape to create some natural defenses and choke points.

After a couple of weeks doing skirmishes and playing some online games I have started playing the single-player campaigns. So far so good. This is one of those areas where the Command & Conquer franchise has always done well. The storylines are fun and well-written and make the game feel much more alive. Seeing Michael Ironside and Billy Dee Williams among the actors in the game is kind of like an 80’s flashback, but cool although I must admit that I am somewhat biased since I am a fan of their work.

Between C&C3 and the announced StarCraft 2 it looks like the genre may be experiencing a bit of a renaissance.

–Jon

Capitulation: It’s What’s For Dinner! (Updated)

Democratic PartyIt is now near the end of 2007 the first year the democratic party has controlled both houses of congress since 1993 and a good time to evaluate the past year.

I am not sure how to say this in a more kind and less offensive way so I am just going to come out and say it - we are pretty fucked right about now. It seems the more important the issue is to the electorate, the more likely the democratically-controlled congress is going to capitulate to the Bush administration and with it their constituency of neocons, crooks, and zealots.

The sad thing is that we are not in this predicament because of the failures of the republican party (which there is so many one could write volumes) but the failure of the democratic leadership in passing any substantial legislation for the people of the United States at all.

The democratic party was elected to the majority of both chambers of congress in 2006 because of one main factor: Iraq. Iraq has become the 800-pound gorilla in the room and is arguably one of the biggest blemishes on this nation’s history and standing, and the public saw the democratic party as the only way to end this debacle and reign in Bush.

According to this poll (warning: PDF) back in January, 45% of the people polled wanted the new congress to focus on Iraq compared to the second most common answer, the economy, at only 7%.

And then you have this other poll (warning: PDF) from back in March that found that 59% of ALL Americans wanted legislation calling for a troop pullout from Iraq by August 2008. 59%! That is not some small group of extremists or some fringe group, but the majority of the American public.

So what is the newly-elected democratic leadership to do? A wise person would choose to give the public what they expected and get us the fuck out of Iraq. Well, to their credit they did give it one good shot only to have Mr. 24% approval rating veto it.

But since this high-point in their tenure, it has been all downhill with the majority party acting more like a timid schoolboy afraid to get some bumps or scrapes on the playground than the party that was elected to change the direction of the country.

Should the democrats be surprised when under their leadership that congress has a record-low 11% approval rating when they constantly let people down?

Just last month Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Democrats won’t approve more money for the Iraq war this year unless President Bush agrees to begin bringing troops home. And what does our democratically-controlled congress say today? Here’s another $70 billion George! Yes, that’s right. They capitulated yet AGAIN to not only give the worst president in US history more funding for the most expensive and worst foreign policy disaster in United States history, but they also are going to do so without any conditions.

Capitulation goes beyond Iraq too. Today there was MASSIVE capitulation on an update to the FISA bill, this time giving telecom companies that illegally cooperated with the Bush administration’s domestic spy program (with some assistance coming BEFORE 9/11) retroactive immunity. This is basically a “Get Out Of Jail Free” card for all these multi-billion dollar telecoms who willingly and knowingly were breaking the law.

Where is the oversight? Where is the accountability? Where is the action? Where is the outrage?

If this blatant disregard for the electorate’s wishes had happened 100 years ago there would be a revolution. But in today’s society of iPods, reality TV, MySpace, it seems that apathy is running at an all-time high.

So I guess the question is what do we do now? I have no fucking clue, but moving seems like such a good option at times.

–Jon

UPDATE: Looks like Senator Dodd’s threat of a filibuster against fellow democrats on the FISA bill worked and forced Harry Reid to table the bill until January. Kudos to Senator Dodd for standing up for what’s right.

Also here is a snippet of a zinger from Senator Ted Kennedy which basically sums up why this bill with retroactive immunity for the telecoms is BS:

The President has said that American lives will be sacrificed if Congress does not change FISA. But he has also said that he will veto any FISA bill that does not grant retro-active immunity. No immunity, no FISA bill. So if we take the President at his word, he’s willing to let Americans die to protect the phone companies.